MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
35,130 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Brake disc significantly and obviously worn (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Front Shock absorber has negligible damping effect (5.3.2 (b))
Headlamp not working on dipped beam (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Headlamp not working on main beam (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Rear Shock absorber has a serious fluid leak (5.3.2 (b))
Rear Shock absorber has negligible damping effect (5.3.2 (b))
Rear reflector missing (4.8.2 (a) (ii))
Steering linkage locking device missing (2.1.3 (d))
Fuel system component leaking excessively or a risk of fire (6.1.3 (b) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Pillion seat insecure (6.2.6 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Front tyre flat
Nearside Direction indicator flashing more than 120 times a minute (4.4.4 (a))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Steering headbearing slightly stiff or notchy (2.2.2 (f) (i))
Rear Shock absorber has a reduced damping effect (5.3.2 (b))
All direction indicators not working (4.4.1 (a) (ii))
Front Steering linkage locking device ineffective (2.1.3 (d))
Front Upper Steering headbearing has excessive wear or free play (2.2.2 (f) (i))
Horn not working (7.7 (a))
Rear Stop lamp does not illuminate by the operation of both brake controls (4.3.2 (a) (iii)) DANGEROUS
Rear Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Headlamp aim too low (4.1.2 (a))
Rear Shock absorber has a reduced damping effect (5.3.2 (b))
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (5.2.3 (e))
All direction indicators not working (4.4.1 (a) (ii))
Front Brake disc significantly and obviously worn (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Horn not working (7.7 (a))
Roller brake test The less effective brake control does not achieve an efficiency of 25% (1.2.2 (a) (i))
Steering headbearing excessively stiff or notchy (2.2.2 (f) (i))
Steering operation fouling on the fuel tank or bodywork on full lock (2.1.4 (b))
Front Brake has no recorded effort at a wheel (1.2.1 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Front Tyre tread not clearly visible (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Riders seat insecure (6.2.5 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Stop lamp does not illuminate by the operation of both brake controls (4.3.2 (a) (iii)) DANGEROUS
Headlamp aim projected beam image obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Nearside Brake lever insecure (1.1.2 (e) (i))
Steering operation fouling on the fuel tank or bodywork on full lock (2.1.4 (b))
Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.0 mm thick (1.1.13 (a)) DANGEROUS
Front Tyre tread not clearly visible (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Headlamp lens slightly defective (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Steering headbearing has excessive wear or free play (2.2.2 (f) (i))
Headlamp lens slightly defective (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (1.1.13 (a))
Rear Upper Brake component slightly loose (1.1.21 (c))
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(i))
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
How Reliable is the Piaggio Zip?
Based on 101,622 MOT tests across 18,758 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
WF61 SYA is a 2011 Piaggio Zip in Black with a 49cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 14 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 64.3%.
Across all 2011 Piaggio Zip models, the average MOT pass rate is 77.0% with a typical mileage of 8,408 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Piaggio Zip fails its MOT is headlamp at least one does not illuminate on dipped beam, accounting for 1,911 recorded failures. If you're considering buying WF61 SYA, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Piaggio Zip typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 15 years old, this Piaggio Zip is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of WF61 SYA?
You can check the full history of WF61 SYA by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was WF61 SYA registered?
WF61 SYA is a 2011 Piaggio Zip, first registered on 5 November 2011.
Is WF61 SYA safe to buy?
The MOT history for WF61 SYA shows 14 tests with a 64.3% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does WF61 SYA have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on WF61 SYA. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.