MOT Status
ValidMileage
44,361 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Central Rear Lower Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Horn not working (7.7 (a))
Central Rear Lower Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Central Rear Lower Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Headlamp not working on dipped beam (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Headlamp not working on main beam (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.0 mm thick (1.1.13 (a)) DANGEROUS
Central Rear Lower Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Indicator switch faulty (4.4.2 (a) (i))
Central Rear Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Headlamp not working on dipped beam (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Rear Brake lever has insufficient reserve travel (1.1.2 (a))
Rear Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a))
Rear Shock absorber has negligible damping effect (5.3.2 (b))
Rear Upper Suspension component pin or bush excessively worn both (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Stop lamp not working (4.3.1 (a) (ii))
Rear Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Central Rear Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Indicator switch faulty (4.4.2 (a) (i))
Central Rear Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Rear Upper Suspension pin, bush or joint worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Upper Suspension pin, bush or joint worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Shock absorber has a reduced damping effect (5.3.2 (b))
Nearside Rear Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (5.3.2 (b))
Nearside Rear Upper Shock absorber has a slightly worn bush (5.3.2 (c))
Offside Rear Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (5.3.2 (b))
Offside Rear Upper Shock absorber has a slightly worn bush (5.3.2 (c))
Rear Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a))
Stop lamp not working (4.3.1 (a) (ii))
Nearside Rear Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (5.3.2 (b))
Nearside Rear Upper Shock absorber has a slightly worn bush (5.3.2 (c))
Offside Rear Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (5.3.2 (b))
Offside Rear Upper Shock absorber has a slightly worn bush (5.3.2 (c))
Offside Rear Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (5.3.2 (b))
Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.0 mm thick (1.1.13 (a)) DANGEROUS
Rear Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Rear Wheel bearing play so excessive that directional control is impaired (5.1.3 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Offside Rear Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (5.3.2 (b))
Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (1.1.13 (a))
Rear Brake indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (1.2.1 (e))
Rear Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (5.3.2 (b))
Front Tyre has a lump or bulge caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (5.2.3 (d) (i))
Headlamp not working on dipped beam (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Headlamp not working on main beam (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (1.1.13 (a))
Rear Brake indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (1.2.1 (e))
Rear Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (5.3.2 (b))
Rear shock absorber has a light misting (2.4.A.1c)
Exhaust is leaking and excessively noisey (7.1.1b)
Indicator switch defective (1.5.4)
Nearside Front shock absorber seal failed and leaking oil (2.3.3)
Steering headbearing has excessive free play (2.2.2)
Rear shock absorber has a light misting (2.4.A.1c)
Rear shock absorber has a light misting (2.4.A.1c)
Front shock absorber seal failed and leaking oil (2.3.3)
Rear Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (4.1.3(ii))
Front Roller brake test indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (3.3.A1d)
Front shock absorber has light misting of stanchion (2.3.3)
Rear Roller brake test indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (3.3.A1d)
Front Roller brake test indicates excessive fluctuation of brake effort (3.3.A1d)
Front Tyre has a tear caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (4.1.2a(ii))
Front shock absorber seal failed and leaking oil (2.3.3)
Headlamp at least one does not illuminate on dipped beam (1.2.2a(i))
Rear Roller brake test indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (3.3.A1d)
Rear Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (4.1.3(ii))
How Reliable is the Peugeot Sum Up?
Based on 2,584 MOT tests across 498 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
WA10 EEY is a 2010 Peugeot Sum Up in Black with a 124cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 23 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 56.5%.
Across all 2010 Peugeot Sum Up models, the average MOT pass rate is 74.6% with a typical mileage of 9,006 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Peugeot Sum Up fails its MOT is shock absorber seal failed and leaking oil, accounting for 142 recorded failures. If you're considering buying WA10 EEY, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Peugeot Sum Up typically stays on UK roads for around 18 years. At 16 years old, this Peugeot Sum Up is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of WA10 EEY?
You can check the full history of WA10 EEY by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was WA10 EEY registered?
WA10 EEY is a 2010 Peugeot Sum Up, first registered on 25 May 2010.
Is WA10 EEY safe to buy?
The MOT history for WA10 EEY shows 23 tests with a 56.5% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does WA10 EEY have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on WA10 EEY. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.