MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
28,235 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Parking brake inoperative on one side (1.4.1 (a))
Rear Brakes imbalanced across an axle Axle 2 (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Service brake has no recorded effort at a wheel (1.2.1 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Oil leak, but not excessive slight oil leak from engine (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Front intermediate steering arm ball-joint cover splitting
Nearside Rear tyre wearing on inner edge
Nearside Front steering control arm ball-joint cover splitting
Nearside Rear brake catching
Offside rear brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.5a)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Rear Brakes imbalanced across an axle Axle 2 (3.7.B.5b)
Nearside Front steering control arm ball-joint cover splitting
Nearside Rear brake catching
Front Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. 29% (3.7.B.5b)
Offside Front tyre worn on inner edge
Offside Rear tyre worn on inner edge
front brake imbalance (25%) recorded on Roller Brake Tester
front inner wings (engine bay) corroding
front suspension struts and suspension arms corroding
Brakes imbalanced across an axle (3.7.B.5b)
Nearside Rear brake caliper leaking (3.6.A.1)
Offside front brake binding (3.7.B.1)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
offside rear service and handbrake efficiency low
offside front brake catching slightly
surface corrosion nearside and offside inner sills
front and rear suspension / crossbeams / shock absorbers - corroded
Nearside Front front brake application uneven (3.7.B.2)
Offside Front front brake application uneven (3.7.B.2)
Parking brake: parking brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.C.1b)
front and rear suspension / crossbeams / shock absorbers - corroded
Nearside Front Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
both front caliper lock taps slightly deteriorated
both front calipers fitted with loctite
Nearside outer track rod end joint cover split/missing
Offside inner track rod end joint cover split/missing
Offside outer track rod end joint cover split/missing
All position lamps adversely affected by the operation of another lamp (1.1.A.3f)
Nearside Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (8.2.3)
Offside Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (8.2.3)
Nearside outer track rod end joint cover split/missing
Offside inner track rod end joint cover split/missing
Offside outer track rod end joint cover split/missing
Rear Parking brake: parking brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.7)
Brakes imbalanced across an axle (3.7.B.5b)
Brakes imbalanced across an axle (3.7.B.5b)
brake disc in such a condition that it is seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Offside Rear Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.5.1g)
Position lamp switch faulty (1.1.A.1)
1. rear suspension tube sliding joint gaitor insecure
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1) DANGEROUS
How Reliable is the Rover 2200 Tc?
Based on 950 MOT tests across 142 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
TSD 682N is a 1974 Rover 2200 Tc in Grey with a 2,204cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 24 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 62.5%.
Across all 1974 Rover 2200 Tc models, the average MOT pass rate is 76.3% with a typical mileage of 53,588 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Rover 2200 Tc fails its MOT is suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded, accounting for 45 recorded failures. If you're considering buying TSD 682N, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Rover 2200 Tc typically stays on UK roads for around 52 years. At 52 years old, this Rover 2200 Tc is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of TSD 682N?
You can check the full history of TSD 682N by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was TSD 682N registered?
TSD 682N is a 1974 Rover 2200 Tc, first registered on 1 September 1974.
Is TSD 682N safe to buy?
The MOT history for TSD 682N shows 24 tests with a 62.5% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does TSD 682N have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on TSD 682N. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.