MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
124,588 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Battery insecure but not likely to fall from carrier (4.13 (a) (i))
Front Gearbox mounting defective center bush cracked ()
Front Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view below wipers cracked (3.2 (a) (i))
Front bumper grill insecure/loose from fixture
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement inner bush d bonding (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front brake pad wiring system damaged
Nearside Front head lamp lower bracket damaged/loose
Nearside Rear bumper damaged
Nearside Rear reverse lamp casing damaged/cracked
Offside Rear Registration plate lamp insecure (4.7.1 (c) (i))
Rear Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush on both sides (5.3.2 (c))
Rear seats folded can not check rear seat belts
Shock absorbers has a reduced damping effect All four shocks (5.3.2 (d))
Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing all four tyres (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
parking rake cable damaged/chaffed on both sides
Brake performance unable to be tested (1.2.1 (g))
Headlamp aim unable to be tested aim light out put reduced (4.1.2 (b))
Nearside Front Track rod end ball joint has excessive play (2.1.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Inner Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick face caliper sticking attention required (1.1.13 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Nearside Front Inner Tyre has ply or cords exposed 205/45/r17 (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Battery insecure but not likely to fall from carrier (4.13 (a) (i))
Front Gearbox mounting defective center bush cracked ()
Front Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view below wipers cracked (3.2 (a) (i))
Front bumper grill insecure/loose from fixture
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement inner bush d bonding (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front brake pad wiring system damaged
Nearside Front head lamp lower bracket damaged/loose
Nearside Rear bumper damaged
Nearside Rear reverse lamp casing damaged/cracked
Offside Rear Registration plate lamp insecure (4.7.1 (c) (i))
Rear Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush on both sides (5.3.2 (c))
Rear seats folded can not check rear seat belts
Shock absorbers has a reduced damping effect All four shocks (5.3.2 (d))
Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing all four tyres (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
parking rake cable damaged/chaffed on both sides
Brake pedal anti-slip provision missing (1.1.2 (c))
Central Rear Seat belt missing (7.1.2 (a))
Nearside Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Nearside Rear Shock absorbers has negligible damping effect (5.3.2 (d))
Offside Suspension arm ball joint excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (1.1.13 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing both tyres (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
slight dent on rim near side front inner edge
Front Exhaust emissions likely to be affected by an induction leak (8.2.2.1 (b))
Offside Front Suspension arm pin or bush excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing both tyres (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
slight dent on rim near side front inner edge
Brake pedal anti-slip provision missing (1.1.2 (c))
Exhaust emissions test not completed because smoke levels are significantly in excess of the specified limit values (8.2.2.2 (f))
Nearside Front Tyre obviously under inflated (5.2.3 (l))
Offside Front Tyre obviously under inflated (5.2.3 (l))
Offside Front Coil spring fractured or broken (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Rear Shock absorbers has a serious fluid leak (5.3.2 (b))
Nearside Front Tyre has a bulge, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Electronic power steering not working (2.6 (c))
Electronic stability control warning lamp indicates a fault (7.12 (e))
Brake pedal anti-slip provision missing (3.3.A.1b)
Nearside Headlamp not working on dipped beam (1.7.5a)
Offside Headlamp not working on dipped beam (1.7.5a)
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 40mm circle outside zone 'A' (8.3.1d)
n/s/f side wall cut
Electronic power steering warning lamp indicates a failure in the system (2.3.8)
Electronic stability system warning lamp indicates a fault (3.4.1c)
Nearside Front coil spring broken (2.4.C.1a)
Parking brake: parking brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.7)
Service brake: service brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.7)
top mounts noisy
How Reliable is the Fiat Punto Evo?
Based on 67,338 MOT tests across 4,471 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
RE59 XDP is a 2009 Fiat Punto Evo in Black with a 1,598cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 21 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 61.9%.
Across all 2009 Fiat Punto Evo models, the average MOT pass rate is 69.9% with a typical mileage of 66,645 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Fiat Punto Evo fails its MOT is coil spring broken, accounting for 1,305 recorded failures. If you're considering buying RE59 XDP, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Fiat Punto Evo typically stays on UK roads for around 16 years. At 17 years old, this Fiat Punto Evo is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of RE59 XDP?
You can check the full history of RE59 XDP by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was RE59 XDP registered?
RE59 XDP is a 2009 Fiat Punto Evo, first registered on 30 December 2009.
Is RE59 XDP safe to buy?
The MOT history for RE59 XDP shows 21 tests with a 61.9% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does RE59 XDP have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on RE59 XDP. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.