MOT Status
ValidMileage
224,151 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output (4.1.4 (b))
Nearside Rear Stop lamp(s) lens defective which has no effect on emitted light (4.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Outer none stuctual corrosion
Rear Outer none stuctual corrosion
Front Headlamp not working on dipped beam (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Front Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (3.4 (b) (ii))
Nearside Front Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output (4.1.4 (b))
Nearside Rear Stop lamp(s) lens defective which has no effect on emitted light (4.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Outer none stuctual corrosion
Rear Outer none stuctual corrosion
Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases flexi (6.1.2 (a))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
rear crossmember/inner panelling corroded
front nearside lower fog lamp/spot light inoperative
offside front wing corroded/holed but not within any prescribed areas and has no sharp edges
tailgate wiper blade deteriorated
Nearside Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (3.4 (b) (ii))
Rear Stop lamp(s) all not working (4.3.1 (a) (iii)) DANGEROUS
front nearside lower fog/spot light inoperative
tailgate wiper blade deteriorated
water leak from engine
front nearside lower fog/spot light inoperative
Nearside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (3.4 (b) (ii))
Offside Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (3.4 (b) (ii))
front nearside lower fog/spot light inoperative
Offside Lower Rear fog lamp insecure (4.5.1 (c) (i))
Offside Rear Lower Vehicle structure slightly corroded within 30cm of towbar mounting inner lower wheel arch structure (6.1.6 (i) (i))
Offside Rear Vehicle structure slightly corroded within 30cm of towbar mounting inner lower wheel arch structure (6.1.6 (i) (i))
front and rear registration plate digits not of the standard stroke width and height but both still legible
front nearside lower fog/spot light inoperative
rear centre high level brake light obscured by a luggage carrier frame
tail gate wiper blade deteriorated
forward facing seating for two with inertia reel seat belts fitted in the rear of the vehicle at the time of the test
front and rear registration plate digits not of standard 14mm stroke width but both still legible at 10mm
front nearside fog/spot light inoperative
tail gate wiper blade deteriorated
Central Front Items removed from driver's view prior to test ()
front and rear registration plate digits not of standard stroke width but both still legible
front offside and nearside lower fog/spot lights inoperative
rear forward facing seating for two with inertia reel seat belts fitted in the rear of the vehicle at the time of the test
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Offside Front Anti-roll bar linkage has slight play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
Oil leak various oil leaks ()
Rear registration plate faded but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
coil spring corroded both rear (2.4.C.1b)
Nearside Front Front position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
Nearside Rear Anti-roll bar linkage has excessive play in a pin/bush (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Vehicle structure has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of the body mountings sill inner and outer (6.1.B.2)
Offside Rear Anti-roll bar linkage has excessive play in a pin/bush (2.4.G.2)
Offside Vehicle structure has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of the body mountings sill inner and outer (6.1.B.2)
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Offside Front Anti-roll bar linkage has slight play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
Oil leak various oil leaks ()
Rear registration plate faded but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
coil spring corroded both rear (2.4.C.1b)
Rear brake bind
poor condition of front brake discs
steering and suspension prescribed areas corroded
water leak
Exhaust has a major leak of exhaust gases front pipe and flexi (7.1.2)
Fuel system component leaking engine area (7.2.3)
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar linkage has excessive play in a ball joint and boots split (2.4.G.2)
Rear brake bind
poor condition of front brake discs
steering and suspension prescribed areas corroded
water leak
Rear Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.5.1g)
Offside Rear brake disc in such a condition that it is seriously weakened (3.5.1i) DANGEROUS
Offside Rear Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
Exhaust emits an excessive level of metered smoke for a turbo charged engine (7.4.B.3b)
Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.5.1g)
Exhaust emits an excessive level of metered smoke for a turbo charged engine (7.4.B.3b)
Front Windscreen has a sticker or other obstruction encroaching into the swept area by more than 40mm outside zone 'A' (8.3.1e)
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Rear fog lamp emits a light other than red (1.3.2e)
Offside Rear Anti-roll bar attachment bracket/mounting insecure (2.4.G.1)
How Reliable is the Mazda Bongo?
Based on 251,584 MOT tests across 14,362 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
N648 CCF is a 1995 Mazda Bongo in Silver with a 2,490cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 30 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 63.3%.
Across all 1995 Mazda Bongo models, the average MOT pass rate is 64.5% with a typical mileage of 135,909 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Mazda Bongo fails its MOT is fog lamp not working, accounting for 6,854 recorded failures. If you're considering buying N648 CCF, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Mazda Bongo typically stays on UK roads for around 31 years. At 31 years old, this Mazda Bongo is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of N648 CCF?
You can check the full history of N648 CCF by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was N648 CCF registered?
N648 CCF is a 1995 Mazda Bongo, first registered on 31 December 1995.
Is N648 CCF safe to buy?
The MOT history for N648 CCF shows 30 tests with a 63.3% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does N648 CCF have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on N648 CCF. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.