MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
216,162 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
All tyres cracked
Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output Both (4.1.4 (b))
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Underbody heavily undersealed
Front Anti-roll bar has slight play in a pin/bush D bushes (2.4.G.2)
General corrosion to underside front to rear and on suspension components
Items removed from driver's view prior to test ()
Oil leak ()
Rear Anti-roll bar has slight play in a pin/bush D bushes both (2.4.G.2)
Undertrays insecure
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 10mm circle within zone 'A' (8.3.1a)
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 40mm circle outside zone 'A' (8.3.1d)
Nearside Front Body or chassis has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of the body mountings Inner sill area marked (6.1.B.2)
Offside Inner Body or chassis has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of the body mountings Sill 3 areas all marked (6.1.B.2)
Front Anti-roll bar has slight play in a pin/bush D bushes (2.4.G.2)
General corrosion to underside front to rear and on suspension components
Items removed from driver's view prior to test ()
Oil leak ()
Rear Anti-roll bar has slight play in a pin/bush D bushes both (2.4.G.2)
Undertrays insecure
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 10mm circle within zone 'A' (8.3.1a)
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 40mm circle outside zone 'A' (8.3.1d)
Nearside Front Inner Body has slight corrosion sill (6.1.B.2)
Nearside Front Upper Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover damaged, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Rear Inner Body has slight corrosion valance behind bumper (6.1.B.2)
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive chassis, next to bumpstop mount (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive crossmember (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Body has slight corrosion centre sill (6.1.B.2)
Offside Front Upper Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover damaged, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear Inner Body has slight corrosion sill (6.1.B.2)
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive next to bumpstop mount (2.4.A.3)
Rear Anti-roll bar has slight play in a pin/bush both d bushes (2.4.G.2)
oil leak
undertrays insecure
Nearside Front Inner Body has slight corrosion sill (6.1.B.2)
Nearside Front Upper Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover damaged, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Headlamp not working on dipped beam (1.7.5a)
Nearside Rear Inner Body has slight corrosion valance behind bumper (6.1.B.2)
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive chassis, next to bumpstop mount (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive crossmember (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Body has slight corrosion centre sill (6.1.B.2)
Offside Front Upper Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover damaged, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear Inner Body has slight corrosion sill (6.1.B.2)
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive next to bumpstop mount (2.4.A.3)
Rear Anti-roll bar has slight play in a pin/bush both d bushes (2.4.G.2)
oil leak
undertrays insecure
1.slight damage to front windscreen 2.head lamp beam patterns poor 3.chassis members at rear starting to corrode 4.inner sill backings at rear starting to corrode
Rear fog lamp tell tale not working (1.3.1b)
4. Nearside front tyre near legal limits. 5. Slight damage to windscreen.
Offside front bottom ball joint and drop link ball joint dust covers becoming perished. 2. Offside rear tyre near legal limits. 3. Offside front tyre at legal limits.
1. Front cross member becoming corroded. 2. Slight blow on front exhaust section. 3. Both head lamp lenses becoming deteriorated.
hand brake travel at limits
Offside Front Anti-roll bar linkage has slight play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Offside Front Anti-roll bar linkage has slight play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front constant velocity joint gaiter split (2.5.C.1a)
Offside Front Service brake is causing the vehicle to swerve to the nearside (3.7.C.2) DANGEROUS
Offside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Nearside Front Lower Front suspension locking device missing (2.5.A.4)
Nearside Front suspension has excessive play in a lower suspension ball joint (2.5.B.1a)
Offside Front Front constant velocity joint gaiter split (2.5.C.1a)
Offside Rear fog lamp missing (1.3.2a)
How Reliable is the Mazda Bongo?
Based on 251,584 MOT tests across 14,362 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
N229 CCF is a 1995 Mazda Bongo in Green with a 2,490cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 21 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 61.9%.
Across all 1995 Mazda Bongo models, the average MOT pass rate is 64.5% with a typical mileage of 135,909 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Mazda Bongo fails its MOT is fog lamp not working, accounting for 6,854 recorded failures. If you're considering buying N229 CCF, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Mazda Bongo typically stays on UK roads for around 31 years. At 31 years old, this Mazda Bongo is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of N229 CCF?
You can check the full history of N229 CCF by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was N229 CCF registered?
N229 CCF is a 1995 Mazda Bongo, first registered on 31 December 1995.
Is N229 CCF safe to buy?
The MOT history for N229 CCF shows 21 tests with a 61.9% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does N229 CCF have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on N229 CCF. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.