MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
134,983 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Brake pipe excessively corroded Both front brake pipes corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Offside Rear Vehicle structure has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of the body mountings inner arch corroded (6.1.B.2)
Rear fog lamp not working (1.3.2b)
Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
General suspension corrosion
Nearside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Offside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Offside Track rod end loose (2.2.B.1d)
Under-trays fitted obscuring some underside components
Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
General suspension corrosion
Nearside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Offside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Under-trays fitted obscuring some underside components
Battery insecure (1.9.1)
Horn not working (1.6.2a)
Offside Front Track rod end ball joint dust cover excessively deteriorated so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (2.2.C.1c)
Offside Rear Suspension arm ball joint dust cover excessively deteriorated so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Nearside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Offside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
general suspension corrosion
Both front antiroll bar drop link bushes poor condition
Both track rod end gaiters poor condition
Wiper blades poor condition
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Both front antiroll bar drop link bushes poor condition
Both track rod end gaiters poor condition
Wiper blades poor condition
Front brake discs generally corroded
Horn not loud enough to be heard by another road user (1.6.2b)
Headlamp not in good working order adversely affecting beam image (1.2.4a)
Headlamps poor e=eam image, border line pass
Side position bulbs debatable colour (bluish)
Exhaust emits an excessive level of metered smoke for a turbo charged engine (7.4.B.3b)
Headlamps poor e=eam image, border line pass
Nearside Side repeater incorrect colour (1.4.A.2f)
Offside Side repeater incorrect colour (1.4.A.2f)
Side position bulbs debatable colour (bluish)
Windscreen has a sticker or other obstruction encroaching into the swept area by more than 40mm outside zone 'A' (8.3.1e)
Headlamp beam image poor
Indicator repeater lamps faded
Nearside rear seatbelt twisted
Nearside rear tyre wall perished
Offside front wheel bearing noise evident, border line pass
Side position lamps debateable colour, border line pass
Nearside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Front suspension stiff operation, border line pass
Headlamp beam image poor
Indicator repeater lamps faded
Nearside rear seatbelt twisted
Nearside rear tyre wall perished
Offside front wheel bearing noise evident, border line pass
Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.5c)
Side position lamps debatable colour, border line pass
Nearside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.5c)
Offside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear fog lamp missing (1.3.2a)
Rear fog lamp switch missing (1.3.1a)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
front suspension very rigid
How Reliable is the Nissan Largo?
Based on 13,079 MOT tests across 1,274 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
M148 XJK is a 1996 Nissan Largo in Black with a 1,970cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 16 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 50%.
Across all 1996 Nissan Largo models, the average MOT pass rate is 65.8% with a typical mileage of 127,287 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Nissan Largo fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 1,006 recorded failures. If you're considering buying M148 XJK, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Nissan Largo typically stays on UK roads for around 33 years. At 30 years old, this Nissan Largo is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of M148 XJK?
You can check the full history of M148 XJK by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was M148 XJK registered?
M148 XJK is a 1996 Nissan Largo, first registered on 1 January 1996.
Is M148 XJK safe to buy?
The MOT history for M148 XJK shows 16 tests with a 50% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does M148 XJK have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on M148 XJK. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.