MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
26,024 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (1.1.13 (a))
Front Headlamp lens slightly defective (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Front Road spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Shock absorber has a reduced damping effect (5.3.2 (b))
Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Wheel bearing has slight play (5.1.3 (a) (i))
Indicator switch faulty (4.4.2 (a) (i))
Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced body front /underneath (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced frame (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Rear Road spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (1.1.2 (d))
Offside Rear Road spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
front fairing headlight mounting has been taped to secure
unable to see thickness of rear brake pads
Front Road spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Suspension corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Wheel bearing has slight play (5.1.3 (a) (i))
Headlamp lens slightly defective (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Indicator switch faulty (4.4.2 (a) (i))
Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced under neath body (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Rear Road spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (1.1.2 (d))
Offside Rear Road spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Suspension corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
front suspension has reduced damping affect
movement in rear subframe bushes
upper headlight fairing loose
Front Suspension corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (5.2.3 (e))
Headlamp lens slightly defective damaged at top (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Indicator switch faulty (4.4.2 (a) (i))
Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced metal body underneath (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Offside Front Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (1.1.2 (d))
Rear Suspension corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (5.2.3 (e))
front suspension when bounce tested very soft
subframe rubber bushes badly perished
Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (6.1.2 (a))
Front Suspension corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Indicator switch faulty (4.4.2 (a) (i))
Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Suspension corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
front brake lever bent
headlamp has a crack
the front suspension is slightly soft when operated
Central Lower Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced frame (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Front Road spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Road spring corroded both (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Direction indicator not working (4.4.1 (a) (ii))
Front Valve stem seriously damaged (5.2.3 (j)) DANGEROUS
Rear Valve stem seriously damaged (5.2.3 (j)) DANGEROUS
Central Lower Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced frame (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Front Road spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Road spring corroded both (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Exhaust is leaking but is not excessively noisey (7.1.1b)
Exhaust is leaking but is not excessively noisey (7.1.1b)
Offside Rear Direction indicators not working (1.5.1c)
Front wheel bearings have slight free play (2.3.5b)
Front Headlamp damaged but function not impaired (1.2.3a)
Rear Exhaust is leaking and excessively noisey (7.1.1b)
Front Headlamp damaged but function not impaired (1.2.3a)
Fuel cap sealing washer missing (7.2.2c)
Exhaust excessively deteriorated (7.1.1a)
Front Exhaust is leaking and excessively noisey (7.1.1b)
Rear Fuel cap sealing washer missing (7.2.2c)
Rear Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (4.1.3(ii))
Front Headlamp aim too high (1.6)
How Reliable is the Piaggio Vespa GT 200?
Based on 4,440 MOT tests across 435 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
LF05 HDC is a 2005 Piaggio Vespa GT 200 in Black with a 124cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 20 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 70%.
Across all 2005 Piaggio Vespa GT 200 models, the average MOT pass rate is 86.2% with a typical mileage of 18,472 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Piaggio Vespa GT 200 fails its MOT is tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm, accounting for 143 recorded failures. If you're considering buying LF05 HDC, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Piaggio Vespa GT 200 typically stays on UK roads for around 23 years. At 21 years old, this Piaggio Vespa GT 200 is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of LF05 HDC?
You can check the full history of LF05 HDC by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was LF05 HDC registered?
LF05 HDC is a 2005 Piaggio Vespa GT 200, first registered on 24 August 2005.
Is LF05 HDC safe to buy?
The MOT history for LF05 HDC shows 20 tests with a 70% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does LF05 HDC have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on LF05 HDC. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.