MOT Status
ValidMileage
110,760 miAbove average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Upper Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both side arm bush cracking (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Coil spring corroded both (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Nail in tyre both side ()
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
items on rear seats obstructing seat belt view
Offside Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Front Upper Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both side arm bush cracking (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Coil spring corroded both (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Nail in tyre both side ()
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
items on rear seats obstructing seat belt view
Front Engine mounting damaged but not to excess (6.1.8 (a) (i))
Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (3.4 (b) (ii))
Offside Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Rear Service brake excessively fluctuating (1.2.1 (e))
Front Engine mounting damaged but not to excess (6.1.8 (a) (i))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
all rear seat belts not checked - ex/bags - clothes and rubbish on top of rear seats no access to belts
Nearside Front Windscreen in an unacceptable condition (3.2 (c) (i))
Offside Front Windscreen in an unacceptable condition (3.2 (c) (i))
all rear seat belts not checked - ex/bags - clothes and rubbish on top of rear seats no access to belts
Heat shield insecure
Items on rear seats obstructing seat belt view
Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement NSF & OSF (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Undertray not fully secure (8.1.1 (b) (i))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
Windscreen wiper blade defective (3.4 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view crack up near side of windscreen (3.2 (a) (i))
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 10mm circle within zone 'A' (8.3.1a)
large crack on n/s part of windscreen
Front Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 10mm circle within zone 'A' (8.3.1a)
Nearside Front windscreen has a large crack in screen
Centre Rear Seat belt installation causes a lap belt to be incorrectly positioned across the occupant (5.3.1u)
Front Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 10mm circle within zone 'A' (8.3.1a)
Nearside Front windscreen has a large crack in screen
Nearside Rear Registration plate lamp not illuminating the registration plate (1.1.C.1e)
Offside Rear Direction indicators incorrect colour (1.4.A.2f)
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 10mm circle within zone 'A' (8.3.1a)
both front tyres have cuts on inside sidewall
How Reliable is the Seat Exeo?
Based on 105,166 MOT tests across 8,155 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
KN59 KXZ is a 2009 Seat Exeo in Silver with a 1,968cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 19 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 73.7%.
Across all 2009 Seat Exeo models, the average MOT pass rate is 78.9% with a typical mileage of 95,262 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Seat Exeo fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 1,618 recorded failures. If you're considering buying KN59 KXZ, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Seat Exeo typically stays on UK roads for around 17 years. At 17 years old, this Seat Exeo is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of KN59 KXZ?
You can check the full history of KN59 KXZ by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was KN59 KXZ registered?
KN59 KXZ is a 2009 Seat Exeo, first registered on 7 December 2009.
Is KN59 KXZ safe to buy?
The MOT history for KN59 KXZ shows 19 tests with a 73.7% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does KN59 KXZ have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on KN59 KXZ. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.