MOT Status
ValidMileage
32,952 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Macpherson strut pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both front (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Play in steering rack inner joint(s) ()
Suspension component ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated both fronts (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Macpherson strut pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both front (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Play in steering rack inner joint(s) ()
Suspension component ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated both fronts (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (3.5 (a))
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Macpherson strut pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both front (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (4.7.1 (b) (i))
Suspension component ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated both front (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Macpherson strut pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both front (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Suspension arm ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated both front (5.3.4 (b) (i))
front tyres wearing on edges
Macpherson strut pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both front (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Nail in tyre ()
Suspension arm ball joint dust cover deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt Both front arms
front tyres wearing on edges
Macpherson strut pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both front (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Suspension arm ball joint dust cover deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt Both front arms
front tyres wearing on edges
Battery insecure and likely to fall from carrier (4.13 (a) (ii))
Macpherson strut pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both front (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Suspension arm ball joint dust cover deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt Both front arms
brake fluid discoloured
front tyres wearing on edges
Macpherson strut has slight movement at the upper attachment Both front struts (2.5.A.1c)
Suspension arm ball joint dust cover deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt Both front arms (2.4.G.2)
brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened Both rear (3.5.1i)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
How Reliable is the Renault Wind?
Based on 38,317 MOT tests across 2,373 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
KEZ 955 is a 2010 Renault Wind in Blue with a 1,598cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 13 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 84.6%.
Across all 2010 Renault Wind models, the average MOT pass rate is 72.4% with a typical mileage of 44,826 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Renault Wind fails its MOT is coil spring broken, accounting for 842 recorded failures. If you're considering buying KEZ 955, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Renault Wind typically stays on UK roads for around 16 years. At 16 years old, this Renault Wind is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of KEZ 955?
You can check the full history of KEZ 955 by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was KEZ 955 registered?
KEZ 955 is a 2010 Renault Wind, first registered on 23 December 2010.
Is KEZ 955 safe to buy?
The MOT history for KEZ 955 shows 13 tests with a 84.6% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does KEZ 955 have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on KEZ 955. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.