MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
88,570 miAbove average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Parking brake: parking brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.C.1b)
both front brake pipes to hose near corrosion limit
emissions tested on default
exhaust centre section deteriorated and blowing
nearside front shock absorber weeping
pitting on rear brake discs
slight corrosion on both outer floors
slight corrosion on rear brake pipes to hoses
wear in both rear diff mounting bushes
Parking brake: parking brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.C.1b)
Rear fog lamp not working (1.3.2b)
both front brake pipes to hose near corrosion limit
emissions tested on default
exhaust centre section deteriorated and blowing
nearside front shock absorber weeping
pitting on rear brake discs
slight corrosion on both outer floors
slight corrosion on rear brake pipes to hoses
wear in both rear diff mounting bushes
Parking brake: parking brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.C.1b)
both front brake pipes to hose near corrosion limit
centre section of exhaust badly deteriorated and blowing
emissions tested on default (exact match not found)
pitting on all brake discs
sideskirts fitted not allowing full inspection of sills
slight corrosion on rear brake pipes to hoses
Front registration plate font not substantially similar to the prescribed font (6.3.4d)
Nearside Front Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords (4.1.D.1a)
Rear Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords (4.1.D.1a)
Rear fog lamp tell tale not working (1.3.1b)
Parking brake: parking brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.C.1b)
both front brake pipes to hose near corrosion limit
centre section of exhaust badly deteriorated and blowing
emissions tested on default (exact match not found)
pitting on all brake discs
sideskirts fitted not allowing full inspection of sills
slight corrosion on rear brake pipes to hoses
default emissions test carried out
exhaust centre section deteriorated and blowing
foot and hand brake readings low
offside front brake pipe near corrosion limit
pitting on rear brake discs
side skirts fitted not allowing full inspection of sills
slight corrosion on nearside front brake piep to flex
Nearside Front Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords (4.1.D.1a)
default emissions test carried out
exhaust centre section deteriorated and blowing
foot and hand brake readings low
offside front brake pipe near corrosion limit
pitting on rear brake discs
side skirts fitted not allowing full inspection of sills
slight corrosion on nearside front brake piep to flex
centre section of exhaust deteriorated and blowing
crack in fog light lens
hand brake travel close to limit
slight cut in nearside front tyre
nail in nearside rear tyre
slight blow on exhaust system
Nearside Front position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
both rear diff mounts split
slight blow on rear exhaust
rear subframe bushes starting to perrish
How Reliable is the Mitsubishi Lancer?
Based on 382,912 MOT tests across 33,260 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
K659 BUD is a 1999 Mitsubishi Lancer in Red with a 1,990cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 12 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 66.7%.
Across all 1999 Mitsubishi Lancer models, the average MOT pass rate is 79.1% with a typical mileage of 71,413 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Mitsubishi Lancer fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 9,095 recorded failures. If you're considering buying K659 BUD, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Mitsubishi Lancer typically stays on UK roads for around 30 years. At 27 years old, this Mitsubishi Lancer is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of K659 BUD?
You can check the full history of K659 BUD by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was K659 BUD registered?
K659 BUD is a 1999 Mitsubishi Lancer, first registered on 9 September 1999.
Is K659 BUD safe to buy?
The MOT history for K659 BUD shows 12 tests with a 66.7% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does K659 BUD have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on K659 BUD. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.