MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
178,978 miAbove average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
underbody undersealed
Front Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced both inner sills corroded (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Offside Front Track rod end ball joint has slight play (2.1.3 (b) (i))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Offside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Brake performance not tested (1.2.1 (g))
Exhaust emissions carbon monoxide content excessive (8.2.1.2 (b))
Offside Front Hydraulic brake calliper insecurely mounted bolt loose (1.1.16 (c) (i))
Seat belt anchorage prescribed area strength or continuity significantly reduced nsr inner sill corroded (7.1.1 (a) (i))
Suspension arm has an unsafe modification osr top check nut loose (5.3.3 (c) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Front Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint dust cover deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt both (2.4.G.2)
Front Track rod end ball joint dust cover deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt both sides (2.2.C.1c)
Offside Front Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output (1.7.5a)
Rear Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.5b)
Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive both sides inner sills (2.4.A.3)
Front suspension ball joint dust cover deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt All boots (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front Tyre starting to perish.
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Side marker light not working
Offside Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output Over spray (1.7.5a)
Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive N/S & O/S inner and outer sills. (2.4.A.3)
Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened N/S & O/S front and rear. (2.4.G.1)
rear brake binding (3.7.B.1)
Front suspension ball joint dust cover deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt All boots (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front Tyre starting to perish.
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Side marker light not working
Offside Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output Over spray (1.7.5a)
Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive N/S & O/S inner and outer sills. (2.4.A.3)
Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened N/S & O/S front and rear. (2.4.G.1)
Offside Front Tyre has a bulge, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (4.1.D.1b)
Rear Brakes imbalanced across an axle Axle 2 (3.7.B.5b)
off side rear sill has slight corrosion.
windscreen has slight scratches.
Rear fog lamp switch faulty (1.3.1a)
Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (8.2.3)
head lights are not the same type.
off side rear sill has slight corrosion.
windscreen has slight scratches.
Nearside Front Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (2.7.3)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
headlamps are not a matched pair
Nearside Front Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (2.7.3)
How Reliable is the Mazda Eunos?
Based on 35,442 MOT tests across 2,197 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
J740 NJR is a 1999 Mazda Eunos in Blue with a 1,600cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 25 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 80%.
Across all 1999 Mazda Eunos models, the average MOT pass rate is 68.8% with a typical mileage of 137,731 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Mazda Eunos fails its MOT is parking brake: efficiency below requirements, accounting for 1,156 recorded failures. If you're considering buying J740 NJR, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Mazda Eunos typically stays on UK roads for around 37 years. At 27 years old, this Mazda Eunos is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of J740 NJR?
You can check the full history of J740 NJR by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was J740 NJR registered?
J740 NJR is a 1999 Mazda Eunos, first registered on 29 March 1999.
Is J740 NJR safe to buy?
The MOT history for J740 NJR shows 25 tests with a 80% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does J740 NJR have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on J740 NJR. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.