MOT Status
ValidMileage
26,664 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both sides (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear exhaust silencer and flange heavily corroded
slight brake bind detected on rear wheels whilst checking wheel bearings
surface corrosion on underside components
Headlamp lens slightly defective both (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both sides (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Service brake binding but not excessively both sides (1.2.1 (f))
Rear exhaust silencer + fixings+ flange corroded
corrosion on some underside components
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened all brake discs (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Lower Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened o/s and n/s (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened recommend oil treatment (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material front to rear brake pipe,, at rear (1.1.11 (c))
Nearside Rear Service brake binding but not excessively recommend check (1.2.1 (f))
Offside Rear Service brake binding but not excessively slight (1.2.1 (f))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
exhaust system, slight deterioration
o/s and n/s headlamp lenses, slight deterioration, light outputs , slightly reduced
windscreen, stone chip
Nearside Track rod end ball joint has excessive play (2.1.3 (b) (i))
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened all brake discs (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Lower Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened o/s and n/s (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened recommend oil treatment (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material front to rear brake pipe,, at rear (1.1.11 (c))
Nearside Rear Service brake binding but not excessively recommend check (1.2.1 (f))
Offside Rear Service brake binding but not excessively slight (1.2.1 (f))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
exhaust system, slight deterioration
o/s and n/s headlamp lenses, slight deterioration, light outputs , slightly reduced
windscreen, stone chip
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened all brake discs, surface corrosion (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Service brake fluctuating, but not excessively slight fluctuation, all brakes (1.2.1 (e))
Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened front and rear (5.3.3 (b) (i))
exhaust system, slightly deteriorated
o/s and n/s headlamp lenses, deteriorated, output and beam images slightly reduced
throttle pedal, slightly sticky in operation
windscreen, stone chip
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened all brake discs, surface corrosion (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Position lamp light intensity significantly reduced (4.2.3 (a) (ii))
Service brake fluctuating, but not excessively slight fluctuation, all brakes (1.2.1 (e))
Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened front and rear (5.3.3 (b) (i))
exhaust system, slightly deteriorated
o/s and n/s headlamp lenses, deteriorated, output and beam images slightly reduced
throttle pedal, slightly sticky in operation
windscreen, stone chip
Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material o/s and n/s rear (1.1.11 (c))
Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened front and rear,, (5.3.3 (b) (i))
exhaust system, slight deterioration in places
o/s and n/s headlamp lenses, slight deterioration,, light intensities slightly reduced
windscreen, minor chip
Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material o/s and n/s rear (1.1.11 (c))
Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened front and rear subframes, surface corrosion (5.3.3 (b) (i))
all brake discs, surface corrosion
exhaust system, slight deterioration in places
o/s and n/s headlamp lenses, slight deterioration,, image intensities, slightly reduced
windscreen, minor chip
Nearside Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
exhaust system slightly deteriorated
o/s and n/s headlamp lenses, slightly deteriorated,, beam image outputs slightly diminished
windscreen, stone chip
Nearside Front Front passenger door cannot be opened from inside the vehicle (6.2.3 (a))
Nearside Rear Service brake excessively binding (1.2.1 (f))
Nearside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin pads deteriorated,, recommend replace (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Nearside Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin recommend replace (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
exhaust system slightly deteriorated
o/s and n/s headlamp lenses, slightly deteriorated,, beam image outputs slightly diminished
windscreen, stone chip
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge tread worn slightly uneven (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge tread worn uneven,, recommend replace (5.2.3 (e))
n/s/r brake binding slightly
o/s and n/s headlamp beam outputs, slightly diminished
o/s/f brake binding slightly
rear exhaust silencer box, slightly deteriorated
windscreen, stone chip
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 10mm circle within zone 'A' (8.3.1a)
n/s/f tyre tread, slightly uneven
o/s/f tyre, tread worn uneven,, recommend replace
rear exhaust silencer box, slight deterioration
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Nearside Front Front suspension has slight play in a upper suspension ball joint (2.5.B.1a)
Offside Front tyre out of shape
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 10mm circle within zone 'A' (8.3.1a)
Nearside Rear Tyre has ply or cords exposed (4.1.D.1b)
Offside Rear Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords (4.1.D.1a)
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Nearside Front Front suspension has slight play in a upper suspension ball joint (2.5.B.1a)
Offside Front tyre out of shape
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 10mm circle within zone 'A' (8.3.1a)
Offside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Nearside Front Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output (1.7.5a)
Offside Front Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output (1.7.5a)
Front Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (8.2.3)
Nearside Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Offside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
How Reliable is the MG Tf?
Based on 475,348 MOT tests across 28,732 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
HW59 CCJ is a 2009 MG Tf in Grey with a 1,796cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 21 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 66.7%.
Across all 2009 MG Tf models, the average MOT pass rate is 80.1% with a typical mileage of 29,014 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a MG Tf fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 17,890 recorded failures. If you're considering buying HW59 CCJ, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The MG Tf typically stays on UK roads for around 24 years. At 17 years old, this MG Tf is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of HW59 CCJ?
You can check the full history of HW59 CCJ by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was HW59 CCJ registered?
HW59 CCJ is a 2009 MG Tf, first registered on 10 December 2009.
Is HW59 CCJ safe to buy?
The MOT history for HW59 CCJ shows 21 tests with a 66.7% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does HW59 CCJ have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on HW59 CCJ. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.