MOT Status
ValidMileage
275,949 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Inner Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced also cab (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Front Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Upper Steering column top bearing slightly worn or mount (2.2.2 (b))
Central Front Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Central Front Upper Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front underside of cab corroded
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Brake hydraulic reservoir close to minimum mark (1.1.10 (d) (i))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Central Prop shaft bearing has slight play Slightly noisy (6.1.7 (b) (i))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened O/S & N/S - Thickness borderline pass advise renewal (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Oil leak, but not excessive Engine - (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Front Upper Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule X - 3 (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Nearside Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Chassis surface corrosion (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Offside Front Lower Indicator - lamp unit insecure
Offside Front Wheel bearing has slight play (5.1.3 (a) (i))
Offside Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Chassis surface corrosion (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive Between engine/gearbox (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear BRAKES - Rolling brake test showing rear brakes (Drums/shoes) low on tested efficiency O/S & N/S rear
Rear Brakes - High imbalance 26% - rear brakes on MOT rolling brake testing, Just passed.
Steering column top bearing slightly worn Play in top column (2.2.2 (b))
Offside Front Headlamp aim too low (4.1.2 (a))
Offside Front Lower Headlamp lens seriously defective Damaged beam image none (4.1.1 (b) (ii))
Offside Front Upper Outline marker lamp not working Top of cab (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Wheel bearing rough when rotated (5.1.3 (b) (i))
Service brake efficiency below requirements (1.2.2 (a) (i))
Central Prop shaft bearing has slight play Slightly noisy (6.1.7 (b) (i))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened O/S & N/S - Thickness borderline pass advise renewal (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Oil leak, but not excessive Engine - (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Front Upper Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule X - 3 (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Nearside Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Chassis surface corrosion (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Offside Front Lower Indicator - lamp unit insecure
Offside Front Wheel bearing has slight play (5.1.3 (a) (i))
Offside Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Chassis surface corrosion (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive Between engine/gearbox (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear BRAKES - Rolling brake test showing rear brakes (Drums/shoes) low on tested efficiency O/S & N/S rear
Steering column top bearing slightly worn Play in top column (2.2.2 (b))
Age related corrosion on vehicle underside
Chip in windscreen
Condensation within headlamp unit
Front brakes have slight bind
Rear Brakes imbalanced across an axle Axle 2 (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Service brake efficiency below requirements (1.2.2 (a) (i))
Age related corrosion on vehicle underside
Chip in windscreen
Condensation within headlamp unit
Front brakes have slight bind
engine oil leak
oil light flashing
Nearside Front position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
Nearside Headlamp aim too high and too far to the right. (1.8)
Nearside Obligatory mirror insecure (8.1.1)
Nearside Rear Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords (4.1.D.1a)
Offside Front position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
Offside Headlamp aim too high and too far to the right. (1.8)
Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (8.2.3)
Exhaust has a major leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
Exhaust has part of the system excessively deteriorated (7.1.1a)
Offside Rear Stop lamp not working (1.2.1b)
Nearside Track rod end ball joint has slight play (2.2.B.1f)
Offside Headlamp aim too high (1.8)
Front brake pads low
Slight play in steering box
N/S/F TYRE WEARING ON EDGE
How Reliable is the Mitsubishi Canter?
Based on 48,869 MOT tests across 3,677 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
GK53 FFC is a 2004 Mitsubishi Canter in Yellow with a 2,977cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 23 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 78.3%.
Across all 2004 Mitsubishi Canter models, the average MOT pass rate is 67.9% with a typical mileage of 94,490 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Mitsubishi Canter fails its MOT is position lamp(s) not working, accounting for 2,761 recorded failures. If you're considering buying GK53 FFC, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Mitsubishi Canter typically stays on UK roads for around 28 years. At 22 years old, this Mitsubishi Canter is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of GK53 FFC?
You can check the full history of GK53 FFC by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was GK53 FFC registered?
GK53 FFC is a 2004 Mitsubishi Canter, first registered on 10 February 2004.
Is GK53 FFC safe to buy?
The MOT history for GK53 FFC shows 23 tests with a 78.3% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does GK53 FFC have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on GK53 FFC. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.