MOT Status
ValidMileage
54,487 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Frame and Down Tube's Corrosion Need Attention (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Oil Cooler Pipes Exccessively Corroded Needs Attention
Rear Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Rear Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Swing Arm and Brake Torque Arm Corrosion (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Fuel cap ineffective Petrol Cap Seal (6.1.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Direction indicator not working (L/H/R indicator) (4.4.1 (a) (ii))
Front Speedo Cable Rubbing Tyre
Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Frame and Down Tube's Corrosion Need Attention (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Oil Cooler Pipes Exccessively Corroded Needs Attention
Rear Brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Rear Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Rear Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Swing Arm and Brake Torque Arm Corrosion (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Front Brake excessively binding (1.2.1 (f))
Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Suspension corroded but not seriously weakened rear swing arm corroded (5.3.3 (b) (i))
(Fuel Tank Cap Seal Not Original Seal But Not Leaking)
Brake reaction bracket corroded but not seriously weakened (Rear Brake Torque Arm) (1.1.15 (b))
Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (Frame and Swing Arm Corrosion) (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Offside Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Offside Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Rear Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Rear Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (1.1.13 (a))
Rear Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced swing and torque arm (6.1.1 (c) (i))
All direction indicators not working (4.4.1 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Offside Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Offside Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Rear Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Rear Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (1.1.13 (a))
Rear Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced swing and torque arm (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Shock absorber has negligible damping effect (Suspension Seems to be Seized) (5.3.2 (b))
Stop lamp not working (When Rear Brake Applied) (4.3.1 (a) (ii))
(Fuel cap Has Secondry Seal Fitted But not Leaking)
All direction indicators light intensity reduced (4.4.3 (a))
Front Upper Brake pipe inadequately clipped or supported (Slightly Long) (1.1.11 (d) (i))
Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (Swing and Torque Arm Corrosion) (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Offside Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Rear Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Rear Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (1.1.13 (a))
Brake hose slightly chafed hose too long or incorrectly routed (1.1.12 (b) (i))
Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced swingarm (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Offside Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened disc slightly worn (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Rear Body work is loose.
Slight oil weep from engine.
additional seal used on fuel cap not secure
front lower body work is slightly loose
Headlamp aim too high (4.1.2 (a))
Throttle operating incorrectly throttle is not returning to neutral position (6.2.7 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Handlebar grip insecure to handlebar (2.2.1 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Brake hose slightly chafed hose too long or incorrectly routed (1.1.12 (b) (i))
Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced swingarm (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Front Upper wire exposed (insulation missing)
Offside Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened disc slightly worn (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Rear Body work is loose.
Slight oil weep from engine.
additional seal used on fuel cap not secure
front lower body work is slightly loose
Rear Luggage rack insecure
Front Brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (Frame & Swing Arm) (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Nearside Front Front shock absorber seal failed and leaking oil (2.3.3)
Offside Front Throttle operating incorrectly (6.2.1f)
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Drive chain slightly loose (6.2.1d)
Nearside Front shock absorber has light misting of stanchion (2.3.3)
Front Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (4.1.3(ii))
Front wheel insecure (4.2.3b)
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
How Reliable is the Honda Cbx?
Based on 1,759 MOT tests across 305 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
D504 UTU is a 1996 Honda Cbx in Blue with a 749cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 24 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 70.8%.
Across all 1996 Honda Cbx models, the average MOT pass rate is 78.9% with a typical mileage of 37,040 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Honda Cbx fails its MOT is shock absorber seal failed and leaking oil, accounting for 17 recorded failures. If you're considering buying D504 UTU, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Honda Cbx typically stays on UK roads for around 48 years. At 30 years old, this Honda Cbx is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of D504 UTU?
You can check the full history of D504 UTU by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was D504 UTU registered?
D504 UTU is a 1996 Honda Cbx, first registered on 5 December 1996.
Is D504 UTU safe to buy?
The MOT history for D504 UTU shows 24 tests with a 70.8% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does D504 UTU have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on D504 UTU. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.