MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
100,473 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
general corrosion noted underside / sills both sides
Nearside Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
general corrosion noted underside / sills both sides
Front Coil spring corroded both (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Upper Suspension arm ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated both front upper control arm ball joint dust covers perished (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Rear Coil spring corroded both (5.3.1 (b) (i))
both seals corroded
general body corrosion
general under body corrosion
Exhaust Lambda reading after 2nd fast idle outside specified limits (8.2.1.2 (c))
Parking brake efficiency below requirements (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure inner sidewall has multiple tears (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Front Coil spring corroded both (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Upper Suspension arm ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated both front upper control arm ball joint dust covers perished (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Rear Coil spring corroded both (5.3.1 (b) (i))
both seals corroded
general body corrosion
general under body corrosion
Front Upper Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced on both sides near suspension arms (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Front bottom cover fitted on bottom sides covering chassis not allowing full inspection from underneath
Nearside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing cracking on both sides of sidewalls (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Offside Rear Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords on inner side of sidewall and cracking on outer sidewall (5.2.3 (d) (i))
Front Upper Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced on both sides near suspension arms (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Front bottom cover fitted on bottom sides covering chassis not allowing full inspection from underneath
Nearside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing cracking on both sides of sidewalls (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Offside Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Nearside Rear Service brake excessively binding (1.2.1 (f))
Nearside Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength Sill (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Rear Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Offside Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material O/S Central brake pipe has slight corrosion (1.1.11 (c))
Rear Anti-roll bar pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Both rear anti roll bar bushes worn - not excessively (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Inner Tyre worn close to the legal limit edge (4.1.E.1)
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Rear brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Under-trays fitted obscuring some underside components
front bumper damaged
front discs corroded
Offside Front Headlamp aim too high (1.8)
Rear disc,s corroded on inner face n/s and o/s.
How Reliable is the Mazda MX-5?
Based on 2,502,760 MOT tests across 160,823 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
D38 DJM is a 2004 Mazda MX-5 in Silver with a 1,839cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 24 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 75%.
Across all 2004 Mazda MX-5 models, the average MOT pass rate is 75.9% with a typical mileage of 59,584 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Mazda MX-5 fails its MOT is seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded, accounting for 44,475 recorded failures. If you're considering buying D38 DJM, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Mazda MX-5 typically stays on UK roads for around 36 years. At 22 years old, this Mazda MX-5 is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of D38 DJM?
You can check the full history of D38 DJM by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was D38 DJM registered?
D38 DJM is a 2004 Mazda MX-5, first registered on 9 February 2004.
Is D38 DJM safe to buy?
The MOT history for D38 DJM shows 24 tests with a 75% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does D38 DJM have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on D38 DJM. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.