MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
34,777 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (1.1.2 (d))
Front Brake disc significantly and obviously worn (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Headlamp light source and lamp not compatible (4.1.4 (c))
Stop lamp remains on when the brakes are released (4.3.2 (a) (iii)) DANGEROUS
Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (1.1.2 (d))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (1.1.2 (d))
Front Brake excessively binding (1.2.1 (f))
Offside Rear Shock absorber has a serious fluid leak (5.3.2 (b))
Offside Rear Shock absorber has negligible damping effect (5.3.2 (b))
Rear Brake lever has insufficient reserve travel (1.1.2 (a))
Steering headbearing has excessive wear or free play (2.2.2 (f) (i))
Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.0 mm thick (1.1.13 (a)) DANGEROUS
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (1.1.2 (d))
Rear Mudguard insecure ()
Brake lever has inadequate reserve travel rear brake lever (3.1.3b)
Exhaust excessively deteriorated silencer blowing (7.1.1a)
Front Inner Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.2.A1f(i))
Front Roller brake test indicates a binding brake (3.3.A1a)
Front suspension assembly component excessively misaligned fork tube (2.3.1)
Front suspension has excessive stiffness in the suspension movement. (2.3.6b)
Front suspension has inadequate damping effect. (2.3.6c)
Steering movement excessively 'notchy' with the weight on the lower bearing (2.2.1a)
Wheel alignment incorrect which adversely affects the steering (2.5.1)
Steering movement excessively 'notchy' with the wheel raised (2.2.1b) DANGEROUS
Rear Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Steering movement slightly 'notchy' steering headbearings (2.2.1a)
Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.2.A1f(i))
Front Stop lamp does not illuminate immediately a brake applies (1.3.1a)
Front suspension has inadequate damping effect. (2.3.6c)
Rear Brake lever has inadequate reserve travel (3.1.3b)
Steering headbearing has excessive free play (2.2.2)
Rear Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Rear Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Steering movement slightly 'notchy' (2.2.1a)
Front Stop lamp does not illuminate immediately a brake applies (1.3.1a)
Front Tyre has a lump caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (4.1.2a(ii))
Offside Rear Direction indicator damaged and function impaired (1.5.3a)
Rear Brake lever has inadequate reserve travel (3.1.3b)
Rear Stop lamp does not illuminate immediately a brake applies (1.3.1a)
Rear position lamp insecure (1.1.1c)
Rear Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Steering movement slightly 'notchy' (2.2.1b)
Rear Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.2.A1f(i))
Offside Rear Direction indicator incorrect colour (1.5.1b)
Rear Brake lever insecure (3.1.2a)
Rear position lamp damaged and function impaired (1.1.1b)
Rear Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Rear Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Front Stop lamp remains on when the brake is released (1.3.1e)
Front Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords (4.1.2a(i))
Rear Brake lever has inadequate reserve travel (3.1.3b)
Rear Brake lever insecure (3.1.2a)
Rear Stop lamp remains on when the brake is released (1.3.1e)
Rear Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (4.1.3(ii))
Roller brake test The less effective brake control does not achieve an efficiency of 25%. (3.3.A2b) DANGEROUS
Rear Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
advise body scuffs
advise no mirrors fitted at time of test
Offside Rear Lower Exhaust slightly deteriorated (7.1.1a)
How Reliable is the Honda SES125?
Based on 38,216 MOT tests across 4,396 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
CE53 CZA is a 2003 Honda SES125 in Black with a 125cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 18 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 61.1%.
Across all 2003 Honda SES125 models, the average MOT pass rate is 80.1% with a typical mileage of 14,879 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Honda SES125 fails its MOT is tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm, accounting for 948 recorded failures. If you're considering buying CE53 CZA, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Honda SES125 typically stays on UK roads for around 24 years. At 23 years old, this Honda SES125 is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of CE53 CZA?
You can check the full history of CE53 CZA by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was CE53 CZA registered?
CE53 CZA is a 2003 Honda SES125, first registered on 23 October 2003.
Is CE53 CZA safe to buy?
The MOT history for CE53 CZA shows 18 tests with a 61.1% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does CE53 CZA have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on CE53 CZA. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.