MOT Status
ValidMileage
26,501 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Front Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Nearside Rear Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Offside Front Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Offside Rear Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Rear Passenger seat(s) missing at time of test ()
Various underbody corrsosion
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Front Inner Vehicle structure or chassis has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of a body mounting Arch (6.2.2 (d) (i))
Nearside Side repeater lens defective such that the emitted light is adversely affected (4.4.1 (b) (ii))
Nearside Front Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Nearside Rear Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Offside Front Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Offside Rear Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Rear Passenger seat(s) missing at time of test ()
Various underbody corrsosion
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Front Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule both sides (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Offside Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Nearside Rear Vehicle structure strengthening plate or fastening so insecure that structural rigidity is seriously reduced (6.1.1 (b) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Offside Rear Vehicle structure strengthening plate or fastening so insecure that structural rigidity is seriously reduced (6.1.1 (b) (ii)) DANGEROUS
FRONT COUNTER WIEGHT AND MOUNTINGS CORRODED
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Nearside Rear Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush (5.3.2 (c))
Offside Front Brake hose slightly deteriorated (1.1.12 (b) (ii))
Offside Rear Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush (5.3.2 (c))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
REAR LEAF SPRINGS CORRODED
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Front BODY MOUNT SERIOUSLY CORRODED
Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule all close to excess (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material all visible original pipes coated in underseal (1.1.11 (c))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both pitted (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front counter weight corroded
Hydraulic pipe at rear chafing on shockabsorber mount
Nearside Front Inner Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive sill (7.1.1 (a) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive rear diff and gearbox (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear axle mountings and "U" bolts corroded close to excess
Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush all perished (5.3.2 (c))
Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive All underside have extensive surface corrosion (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced extensive surface corrosion throughout (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Brake pedal has insufficient reserve travel sinks to floor (1.1.2 (a))
Brake performance unable to be tested (1.2.1 (g))
Nearside Front Brake pipe connection leaking on a hydraulic braking system (1.1.11 (b) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule all close to excess (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material all visible original pipes coated in underseal (1.1.11 (c))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both pitted (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front counter weight corroded
Hydraulic pipe at rear chafing on shockabsorber mount
Nearside Front Inner Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive sill (7.1.1 (a) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive rear diff and gearbox (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear axle mountings and "U" bolts corroded close to excess
Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush all perished (5.3.2 (c))
Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive All underside have extensive surface corrosion (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced extensive surface corrosion throughout (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Front Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Nearside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Nearside Front Shock absorbers has light misting of oil (5.3.2 (b))
Offside Front Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule (1.1.12 (f) (i))
under side of vehicle generally corroded
Both headlamps have beam deflectors fitted although image distorted will not dazzle other road users.
Engine oil sump corroded/weeping.
Nearside Front Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Nearside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Nearside Front Shock absorbers light misting of oil or has limited damping effect (5.3.2 (b))
Offside Front Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Reverse lamp light output reduced.
Underside of vehicle heavily painted/greased including brake pipes/hoses. However corrosion noted.
Vehicle test class changed from class 7 to class 4 as DGW of the vehicle is 2950KGs and would also satisfy the requirements of a dual purpose vehicle with an unknown unladen weight.
Nearside Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Offside Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Offside Rear fog lamp not working (4.5.1 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Nearside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Nearside Front Wheel bearing has slight play (5.1.3 (a) (i))
Offside Front Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Registration plate lamp throwing direct white light to the rear (4.7.1 (a))
no rear seats fitted at the time of the test
Nearside Side repeater not working (4.4.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Brake pipe excessively corroded (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Rear fog lamp missing (4.5.1 (a) (ii))
Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (3.5 (a))
Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (3.4 (b) (ii))
Nearside Front Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Nearside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Nearside Front Wheel bearing has slight play (5.1.3 (a) (i))
Offside Front Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Registration plate lamp throwing direct white light to the rear (4.7.1 (a))
no rear seats fitted at the time of the test
How Reliable is the Isuzu Rodeo?
Based on 189,090 MOT tests across 12,740 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
AU59 EJL is a 2010 Isuzu Rodeo in White with a 2,999cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 13 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 61.5%.
Across all 2010 Isuzu Rodeo models, the average MOT pass rate is 71.6% with a typical mileage of 83,164 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Isuzu Rodeo fails its MOT is fog lamp not working, accounting for 4,857 recorded failures. If you're considering buying AU59 EJL, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Isuzu Rodeo typically stays on UK roads for around 24 years. At 16 years old, this Isuzu Rodeo is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of AU59 EJL?
You can check the full history of AU59 EJL by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was AU59 EJL registered?
AU59 EJL is a 2010 Isuzu Rodeo, first registered on 1 March 2010.
Is AU59 EJL safe to buy?
The MOT history for AU59 EJL shows 13 tests with a 61.5% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does AU59 EJL have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on AU59 EJL. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.