MOT Status
ValidMileage
205,341 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Suspension component ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated both lower and o/s/f upper perished (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Upper Suspension component ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated splitting and leaking grease (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Service brake fluctuating, but not excessively (1.2.1 (e))
Offside Rear Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. slight lag in operation (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Rear Prop shaft joint worn, but not excessively at diff (6.1.7 (c) (i))
Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge both sides inner edges (5.2.3 (e))
Front Windscreen wiper blade defective poor (3.4 (b) (i))
Headlamp lens slightly defective both sides (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Rear Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Side repeater lens defective which has no effect on emitted light missing (4.4.1 (b) (i))
Rear Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases rear silencer leaking (6.1.2 (a))
Rear fog lamp lens defective which has no effect on emitted light damaged and lamp/lens become water logged - affecting intensity slightly (4.5.1 (b) (i))
passenger airbag off at time of test
Exhaust has a major leak of exhaust gases front exhaust flexi failed (6.1.2 (a))
Nearside Front Service brake excessively binding (1.2.1 (f))
Nearside Rear Brake lining(s) contaminated hub seal leaking? (1.1.13 (b))
Nearside Rear Service brake lagging in operation (1.2.1 (d))
Rear Brakes imbalanced across an axle Axle 2 (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Headlamp lens slightly defective both at limit of acceptable deterioration - affecting pattern and intensity of lights (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Nearside Side repeater lens defective which has no effect on emitted light missing (4.4.1 (b) (i))
Rear Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases rear silencer leaking (6.1.2 (a))
Rear fog lamp lens defective which has no effect on emitted light damaged and lamp/lens become water logged - affecting intensity slightly (4.5.1 (b) (i))
passenger airbag off at time of test
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Outer Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot severely deteriorated (6.1.7 (g) (i))
Nearside Front Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge Both (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Windscreen wiper blade defective Both slightly smeary (3.4 (b) (i))
Offside Front Tyre wearing on inner edge
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
How Reliable is the Ford Ranger?
Based on 1,687,380 MOT tests across 189,558 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
AE63 NUC is a 2013 Ford Ranger in White with a 3,198cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 11 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 90.9%.
Across all 2013 Ford Ranger models, the average MOT pass rate is 77.5% with a typical mileage of 75,712 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Ford Ranger fails its MOT is brake pipe excessively corroded, accounting for 41,033 recorded failures. If you're considering buying AE63 NUC, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Ranger typically stays on UK roads for around 27 years. At 13 years old, this Ford Ranger is still in the earlier part of its expected life.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of AE63 NUC?
You can check the full history of AE63 NUC by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was AE63 NUC registered?
AE63 NUC is a 2013 Ford Ranger, first registered on 24 September 2013.
Is AE63 NUC safe to buy?
The MOT history for AE63 NUC shows 11 tests with a 90.9% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does AE63 NUC have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on AE63 NUC. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.